View Single Post
Old 01-11-2004, 10:50   #11
Gamma_Jammer
level 3
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: U.K.
Posts: 415
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0Gamma_Jammer is an unknown quantity at this point
Interesting to hear you say your results may be too optimised. Admission of this fact is a sign that you're definitely thinking along the right lines imho.

The aim with what I was suggesting was robustness really. I am currently trying to develop a system for my own use that has a high success rate without trying to catch 100% of a given move. Hence the suggestion about winning %. Get that high enough and, provided you've factored in your costs correctly and the few drawdowns aren't excessive, and you're in business.
Gamma_Jammer is offline   Reply With Quote