21-11-2004, 20:43
|
#796 (permalink)
|
|
Time<>Price
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,375
Rep Power: 8
|
Hello Pete..............
These comments were interesting also.............
Quote:
More generally, globalization of trade in goods, services, and assets continues to move forward at an impressive pace, despite some indications of increased resistance to that process and the evident difficulties in completing the Doha Round. The volume of trade relative to world gross domestic product has been rising for decades, largely because of decreasing transportation costs and lowered trade barriers. The increasing shift of world GDP toward items with greater conceptual content has further facilitated increased trade because ideas and services tend to move across borders with greater ease and speed than goods.
Foreign exchange trading volumes have grown rapidly, and the magnitude of cross-border claims continues to increase at an impressive rate. Although international trade in goods, services, and assets rose markedly after World War II, a persistent dispersion of current account balances across countries did not emerge until recent years. But, as the U.S. deficit crossed 4 percent of GDP in 2000, financed with the current account surpluses of other countries, the widening dispersion of current account balances became more evident. Previous postwar increases in trade relative to world GDP had represented a more balanced grossing up of exports and imports without engendering chronic large trade deficits in the United States, and surpluses among many other countries.
|
Quote:
Current account imbalances, per se, need not be a problem, but cumulative deficits, which result in a marked decline of a country's net international investment position--as is occurring in the United States--raise more complex issues. The U.S. current account deficit has risen to more than 5 percent of GDP. Because the deficit is essentially the change in net claims against U.S. residents, the U.S. net international investment position excluding valuation adjustments must also be declining in dollar terms at an annual pace equivalent to roughly 5 percent of U.S. GDP.
The question now confronting us is how large a current account deficit in the United States can be financed before resistance to acquiring new claims against U.S. residents leads to adjustment. Even considering heavy purchases by central banks of U.S. Treasury and agency issues, we see only limited indications that the large U.S. current account deficit is meeting financing resistance. Yet, net claims against residents of the United States cannot continue to increase forever in international portfolios at their recent pace. Net debt service cost, though currently still modest, would eventually become burdensome. At some point, diversification considerations will slow and possibly limit the desire of investors to add dollar claims to their portfolios.
|
and prior comments..........
Quote:
"We do know that the very large interventions (such as in the case of the Bank of Japan) ... do not create very large increases in exchange rates of a protracted nature."
"the degree of sophistication of the international financial markets has reached the point where you can see the fund-flows in the order of magnitudes that we're seeing with remarkably little change in either interest rates or exchange rates as a consequence."
|
Bottom Line....Growth performance comes down to GDP...
Emloyement...Account Balances...and Central Bank Monetary flexibility...with Net Majority Positioning ie "the Fund Flows" being reflective of the Core Fundamentals in the Global Economy...the heartbeat of FX...the next Focus is formulating from the above quad with the conclusion of G20...deficits today...GDP tommorow.
Quote:
|
It is of course possible that U.S. policy initiatives directed at closing the gap between our domestic investment and domestic saving, and hence narrowing our current account deficit, may not suffice. But should such initiatives fall short, the marked increase in the economic flexibility of the American economy that has developed in recent years suggests that market forces should over time restore, without crises, a sustainable U.S. balance of payments. At least this is the experience of developed countries, which since 1980, have managed and eliminated large current account deficits, some in double digits, without major disruption.
|
Last edited by Iris; 21-11-2004 at 21:01.
|
|
|