Quote:
Originally posted by tim_nn
That was not my question. My question was what's the advantage of having the same winning trade 25 times over at the same time rather than having 1 winning trade which is 25 times the size? The reason I'm confused is that you said at first that you were referring to 25 CONSECUTIVE trades. It appears, however, that these were 25 SIMULTANEOUS trades, all closed at exactly the same time. So I think you can understand why people might wonder what the advantage is of trading that way, no? Clearly I've managed to miss the point: I appreciate that and I apologise for it, and for taking up your time, but I'd be really grateful (and I think perhaps others would too) if you'd be kind enough to explain it to those of us less familiar with this technique.
|
I opened 25 positions at different and various prices. I closed the whole trade (250K unit build-up) at once.
It's pretty simple. As for others being "grateful" for any of my explanations... lmao... I think not.
I've been called a loser and a gambler. But those words do not denote a trader who can successfully open and close
47 EUR/USD short trades straight in a row all winners no losers now does it.
I think little explanation is needed to understand why having 100s and 100s of winning trades with no losers is an advantage to trading, though some here think that having that many wins is "bad trading."
Have
them explain that.