|
 |
|
29-06-2005, 16:05
|
#1
|
|
level 2
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 109
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0 
|
clarification needed on trading with fibs
Hello,
I am currently using Metatrader 4 and the fibs begin a 0 and extend to 100 (if you didn't know already  . What I need some clarification on is where to begin the extension for a buy or sell retracement. For example, the trend is heading down, there is a corrective retracement to 62% then it heads down again. Would I place 0 on the fibs at the High and extend down or would I begin by placing 0 at the Low and extend up. The same question applies to the opposite long trade.
Advice much appreciated,
Regards,
Dave
|
|
|
30-06-2005, 04:19
|
#2
|
|
level 3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,414
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 5 
|
Re: clarification needed on trading with fibs
I am not a fibo expert but I would think you would always do it from left to right. So if it is a downtrend, top to bottom; if it is an uptrend, bottom to top. When you look at retracement, you want to guess if the price will continue in the up/downtrend.
|
|
|
30-06-2005, 06:41
|
#3
|
|
Fibonacci KISS trader!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,790
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0 
|
Re: clarification needed on trading with fibs
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DaveB
Hello,
I am currently using Metatrader 4 and the fibs begin a 0 and extend to 100 (if you didn't know already  . What I need some clarification on is where to begin the extension for a buy or sell retracement. For example, the trend is heading down, there is a corrective retracement to 62% then it heads down again. Would I place 0 on the fibs at the High and extend down or would I begin by placing 0 at the Low and extend up. The same question applies to the opposite long trade.
Advice much appreciated,
Regards,
Dave
|
Here's the charts from my trade this morning, target was just met, does that help?
To draw in projections from a retracement level in a downtrend draw from the low point to the retracement level to give you 161.8, the opposite in an uptrend.
Cheers
Mick
|
|
|
30-06-2005, 08:23
|
#4
|
|
level 3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,414
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 5 
|
Re: clarification needed on trading with fibs
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MickMason
Here's the charts from my trade this morning, target was just met, does that help?
To draw in projections from a retracement level in a downtrend draw from the low point to the retracement level to give you 161.8, the opposite in an uptrend.
Cheers
Mick
|
Hi Mick, based on your fib1, wouldn't this be a failure of fibo, since the price did not follow through after breaking the 61.8% level?
|
|
|
30-06-2005, 08:30
|
#5
|
|
Fibonacci KISS trader!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,790
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0 
|
Re: clarification needed on trading with fibs
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by foamgod
Hi Mick, based on your fib1, wouldn't this be a failure of fibo, since the price did not follow through after breaking the 61.8% level?
|
Hi foamgod
A failure? No, it retraced 61.8% and met target at 161.8%, that was the plan.
Mick
|
|
|
30-06-2005, 08:43
|
#6
|
|
level 3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,414
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 5 
|
Re: clarification needed on trading with fibs
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MickMason
Hi foamgod
A failure? No, it retraced 61.8% and met target at 161.8%, that was the plan.
Mick
|
Doesn't a 61.8% retracement imply that a new trend is establishing itself?
|
|
|
30-06-2005, 09:18
|
#7
|
|
Fibonacci KISS trader!
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,790
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0 
|
Re: clarification needed on trading with fibs
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by foamgod
Doesn't a 61.8% retracement imply that a new trend is establishing itself?
|
Not to me it don't
You tell me, anything here to suggest a trend change during this 2 cent move on Cable this morning.....
|
|
|
30-06-2005, 09:28
|
#8
|
|
level 3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,414
Downloads: 3
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 5 
|
Re: clarification needed on trading with fibs
Mick: :PPP I do not use fibo! :PPP
Because from what I read, that's what a 61% retracement is supposed to mean. Was that source wrong?
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|