Register File Sharing Journals Chat Room FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Advertisement







Search Forums
 
» Advanced Search

View Poll Results: How many pips do you earn in 1 month on average?
More than 1000 70 13.06%
500-1000 122 22.76%
300-500 98 18.28%
100-300 120 22.39%
0-100 71 13.25%
Less than 0 55 10.26%
Voters: 536. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 20-01-2005, 20:38   #41
TheSundanceKid
Forex=Legal Bank Robbery
 
TheSundanceKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 183
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0TheSundanceKid is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by autofx
TheSundanceKid,

Trading is hard because of emotion. Trading is not intellectually
hard.

Finding or constructing a strategy that'll give you 50% winners
is not hard at all. I'm not sure why you think it's hard.

But you're right if your point is that executing the system is the
hard part. It is. Most traders don't understand how much their
emotions impact their trading decisions and actions. It's this
that really trips them up.

I agree that trading is very "emotionally hard" - as much or maybe even more so than it is intellectually - but I definitely would not say that trading is not intellectually hard at all, or even close to being easy.
If was so easy to develop a system that gives you a 50% win rate (with a risk:reward ratio better than 1:1), then why not just automate it and remove the emotion factor completely?

Quote:
Originally posted by autofx
On each individual trade, you can never know the answers to
most of the above questions. How much you should risk is an
exception.

I don't think you mean to imply you can put on a trade and know
how much it will go in your favor.

You're correct in assuming that I don't mean on the individual trade, but overall, yes. You should alteast have some idea/theory on how your system's trades will perform on average, that way you can plan your risk/reward, position sizing, exit/profit taking, money management, etc, accordingly.

Quote:
Originally posted by autofx
One's lack of millions isn't related to whether there are simple
systems with 50% win rates. Such systems abound. What's
rare is people who can consistently execute the systems, day
after day, week after week, etc.

If you have the ability to execute such a system with iron
discipline, and live long enough, trading that way all the while,
the money will come.

The statement "...why aren't we all millionaires..." was purely for effect/illustration purposes, nothing further. Again, I was just trying to make the point that I don't believe that such systems can be developed (as well as executed) very easily as a lot of people (including yourself) seem to believe.
It's not like every trader has in their possession, a consistent winning/successful system, but that most can't follow it due to emotional/discipline problems. In my opinion, that is not the case.

Quote:
Originally posted by autofx
You don't know! Heck, a huge comet could strike the earth in
three years and it's all over. You could have a stroke and not
be able to trade any more.

If you need such assurances, trading isn't for you!


LOL, freak accidents can happen, and it certainly doesn't make sense to plan on them!
The point I was trying to make there was that people often assume that their system is profitable because they have backtested and/or forward tested/demo traded it. Then, if it fails when they trade it, they might attribute the failure to an inability to trade the system instead of also considering the possibility that it could be the system itself which is the cause of the failure (of course it could be both ). Now usually it's more common the other way around, which is why you have people using different systems/methodologies every other trade, not realizing that their exection/management is the problem - but I just wanted to point out the uncertainty in this area. Is it's the system's fault? Or your fault? How can we know for sure? (Obviously I'm not talking about making blatant execution/management mistakes here, where it's very clear you're to blame because you deviated from your system/methodology due to lack of discipline, emotional problems, etc.)
Also, isn't the way you trade the system based on/part of the system itself? These are great though provoking questions...

Quote:
Originally posted by autofx
However, IF you practice rules and tactics that mathematically
keep the odds in your favor, and IF a market keeps behaving
the way markets have tended to behave for centuries, and IF
you can render mostly mistake-free execution for a long stretch
of time, you WILL make money.

And if you don't, it's very likley not because you selected a bad
strategy, but far more likely because you never learned to keep
your emotions from controlling your trading actions.


I agree with you that if you have an edge and can consistently exploit it, you will make money in the long run.
However, I don't think that if you fail to make money that it's unlikely your system is to blame, but rather only that you were unable to keep your emotions from controlling your trading decisions.
I don't think we should make "lack of emotional control" the sole possible scapegoat here. If it's clear this is the case, that's one thing - but we should also look to other aspects of the system and ourselves as well.

Good Trading,

Sundance

Last edited by TheSundanceKid : 20-01-2005 at 20:40.
TheSundanceKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005, 21:11   #42
autofx
Grrrrrraillll???
 
autofx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,279
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0autofx is infamous around these partsautofx is infamous around these parts
LOL, freak accidents can happen, and it certainly doesn't make sense to plan on them!
The point I was trying to make there was that people often assume that their system is profitable because they have backtested and/or forward tested/demo traded it. Then, if it fails when they trade it, they might attribute the failure to an inability to trade the system instead of also considering the possibility that it could be the system itself which is the cause of the failure (of course it could be both ).


Well said. Sadly, lots of people are launching into trading a system that hasn't been demo traded or backtested as we speak.
__________________
Bob/autofx
autofx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005, 21:14   #43
autofx
Grrrrrraillll???
 
autofx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,279
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0autofx is infamous around these partsautofx is infamous around these parts
I don't think we should make "lack of emotional control" the sole possible scapegoat here.

If you say so, but it's a major reason people fail at trading.

Not thoroughly thinking through strategies, not backtesting them,
not making sure one can execute them consistently -- OK, blame
lies there too.

BUT, I submit that many traders are trying to execute what should
be winning systems, but cannot do so profitably because of their
lack of mastery of self.
__________________
Bob/autofx
autofx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005, 21:21   #44
TheSundanceKid
Forex=Legal Bank Robbery
 
TheSundanceKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 183
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0TheSundanceKid is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by autofx
I don't think we should make "lack of emotional control" the sole possible scapegoat here.

If you say so, but it's a major reason people fail at trading.

Not thoroughly thinking through strategies, not backtesting them,
not making sure one can execute them consistently -- OK, blame
lies there too.

BUT, I submit that many traders are trying to execute what should
be winning systems, but cannot do so profitably because of their
lack of mastery of self.

Oh, I agree it's definitely a major reason why most people fail at trading, especially when first learning. I wasn't saying it's not, just that it's not always the only reason.

Good Trading,

Sundance
TheSundanceKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005, 21:23   #45
autofx
Grrrrrraillll???
 
autofx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,279
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0autofx is infamous around these partsautofx is infamous around these parts
Again, I was just trying to make the point that I don't believe that such systems can be developed (as well as executed) very easily as a lot of people (including yourself) seem to believe.

I'm not sure what your background is and why you believe it's
such a big deal to come up with winning strategies. It isn't.

But if you want to believe otherwise, I'm not going to go out of
my way to change your mind.
__________________
Bob/autofx
autofx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005, 21:44   #46
TheSundanceKid
Forex=Legal Bank Robbery
 
TheSundanceKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 183
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0TheSundanceKid is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by autofx
Again, I was just trying to make the point that I don't believe that such systems can be developed (as well as executed) very easily as a lot of people (including yourself) seem to believe.

I'm not sure what your background is and why you believe it's
such a big deal to come up with winning strategies. It isn't.

But if you want to believe otherwise, I'm not going to go out of
my way to change your mind.

Hi Bob,

First of all, let me just say that I always (try to) keep an open mind...

My reasoning behind that statement is based on two things:
1) Fortunately, I have been able to create/develop several different profitable systems and trade them successfully- but at no time did I find it an "easy" thing to accomplish. Personally, I would say that determining the methodology was more difficult than actually trading it.
2) If it was so easy to come up with a profitable system, then why do so many traders (the generally accepted statistic being 90%) fail at trading? What factors contribute to this, and how much weight does each carry? Granted, everyone is different, so people may fail for different reasons/combinations of reasons - but I think it would help all of us to get a better understanding of this.

Good Trading,

Sundance
TheSundanceKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005, 21:48   #47
nzbryant
level 3
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 101
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0nzbryant is an unknown quantity at this point
I agree with Sundance - it is not that hard to find a good system BEFORE commission/spread, but once that is taken into account it is hard.

When I say a good system I mean one that beats buy and hold significantly. After commissions many systems underperform buy and hold.
nzbryant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-01-2005, 22:00   #48
TheSundanceKid
Forex=Legal Bank Robbery
 
TheSundanceKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 183
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0TheSundanceKid is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally posted by nzbryant
I agree with Sundance - it is not that hard to find a good system BEFORE commission/spread, but once that is taken into account it is hard.

When I say a good system I mean one that beats buy and hold significantly. After commissions many systems underperform buy and hold.

That's definitely very true, particularily with a short term (intraday) trading system/strategy. It becomes less of a factor with a swing, medium term, or long term trading system, but it's still a big hinderance to profitability nonetheless.
E.G. - Have you ever tried scalping with a 4/5 pip spread?
That's tough!

Good Trading,

Sundance
TheSundanceKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump