Moderating New Members validate new members before they are classified as registered

[JoeTrader]

It’s obvious that some of the people your banning are simply joining back up under new names and continuing what they where banned for. Did you ever consider Moderating New Members validate new members before they are classified as registered members and are allowed to post and or not allowing free email address i.e. yahoo, Hotmail and many others these guy’s use to open mutable account ? , this would surly get keep these guys away..

[zuijlen]

Originally Posted by JoeTrader

It’s obvious that some of the people your banning are simply joining back up under new names and continuing what they where banned for. Did you ever consider Moderating New Members validate new members before they are classified as registered members and are allowed to post and or not allowing free email address i.e. yahoo, Hotmail and many others these guy’s use to open mutable account ? , this would surly get keep these guys away..

Enough of this policing already! We are losing valuable members and are only left with busybodies. This is a trader's forum for goodness' sake!

[Tony_T]

The facts is every well run community needs policing on some sort without it the riffraff will take over and destroy it.. I’m not sure what town you live in but imagine if they stopped policing your town, would you still want to live there? No it would full of riffraff..

Same for this community, if you where to stop policing I am 100% sure it would turn into one of spam filed yahoo forums.

[zuijlen]

I leave the policing to the professionals, not to vigilantes. Notice I said this policing, referring to the previous message. Suddenly all kinds of people come out of the woodwork with some self-righteous attitude, whereas people who have really contributed over time, such as TrendlineBreak are banned or leaving.

I live in a very nice town, thank you. In my town, besides police, we have a justice system.

[sraklo]

Originally Posted by JoeTrader

It’s obvious that some of the people your banning are simply joining back up under new names and continuing what they where banned for. Did you ever consider Moderating New Members validate new members before they are classified as registered members and are allowed to post and or not allowing free email address i.e. yahoo, Hotmail and many others these guy’s use to open mutable account ? , this would surly get keep these guys away..

PUBLIC NOTICE DISCLAIMER:
The author of this post does not endorse or recommend any of the products, systems or services provided by unsolicited links in this post. This post may have been modified by Moneytec at their discretion without the knowledge, consent or notification of the author. Your discretion is advised.

Good god!

It's pretty obvious huh? So I assume you have a verified list of offending members that you can publish? Perhaps all new members should be fingerprinted, bugged and imbedded with tracking devices!

It's people like you living off the values and contributions of others that create most of the problems here. This thread is a prime example. You make accusations without evidence (correct me if I'm wrong) and then hope the rest of the sheep will fall in behind so you can claim some sort of false glory as a great leader/man!

Well, consider yourself challenged... Either put up or shut up!

Regards,
sraklo


P.S. Oh... I see the sheep are already beginning to line up for ya!

[CockeyedCowboy]

Look at Joe's posts and other threads, what can I say ............. Moderator Joe???

Check you later

CockeyedCowboy

[q827]

sraklo was banned lol