Thanks for my LESS Stars!

[Winemaker]

Hey Moneytec
I see you've taken away a Star my name. GOOD.
I think you should take another.

I don't know how you allocate these stars but they should not be based on level of participation.

I am a rooky in FX if you are going to bestow insignia titles etc. they should be based on stringent ratings.

I would not want someone to act on my suggestions because I have too many stars next to my name so please keep them away.

Perhaps you can tell us how these stars titles operate?

[MoneyTec]

Yes I underst appreciate your thoughts but we have a system we feel is fine this way. You may see less stars or a lower Title since we adjusted them this week.

The stars are based on your number of post in the forums The User Titles are used for the creditability factor here on the forums . think of them as an type of award here..



1stars (Minimum Posts: 5)
2stars (Minimum Posts: 25)
3stars (Minimum Posts: 125)
4stars (Minimum Posts: 200)
5stars (Minimum Posts: 400)
New Member (Minimum Posts: 0)
Junior Member (Minimum Posts: 40)
Valued Member (Minimum Posts: 200)
Senior Member (Minimum Posts: 400)

[xtsunami]

To bad there is not a way to account for the quality of the posts made rather than just the number. IMHO there seems to be some who just like to post alot without saying much.

xt

[MoneyTec]

Originally posted by xtsunami
To bad there is not a way to account for the quality of the posts made rather than just the number. IMHO there seems to be some who just like to post alot without saying much.

xt

Yes that would be a helpful asset to the forums regretfully we have not found a way to effectively implement this.. our team helpfull members here try to weed out the useless misleading off topic spamers reword the productive time to time we miss some or two ( The overall rating works if you look at it as a credibility factor on the forums. One that makes useless misleading off topic Spam post isn't here long enough to accumulate rewords.