Register File Sharing Journals Chat Room FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Advertisement







Search Forums
 
» Advanced Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2004, 15:26   #81
mishak
old hand
 
mishak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,066
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0mishak is an unknown quantity at this point
Lightbulb to silverbulit

to post #45148
1. you may be sure I've checked your posts on our Forum for the occurence of the word "leverage". You never disclosed what leverage you use. Therefore I've made the estimation that your leverage can not be more than 1:67.
Now you said you
Quote:
rarely use more than 20:1 leverage
It means my estimation was correct, 20 is less than 67.
Congratulations

Speaking about 1:20 leverage
I believe it is too aggressive, especially for swing trading and even accumulation strategy and I do not recommend this to starters forex fellows.

2. it looks like your "reading skills" are better than mine if so, you may notice than I did not discuss your stopped/reenter or some other trading tactics. The point of my post was the leverage you may had used for trading. Yourself acknowledged that I was right (look itme #1 above).
You may be sure that I
Quote:
comprehend the complex idea of "averaging".


about averaging
I believe that averaging is not too complex, but wrong. I prefer not to buy at 1.2050, average at 1.1950, getting stooped at 1.1880 and "re-open" at 1.1850. I like to stay out of the market waiting for the better price and to buy at 1.1870 (prices are fictional).
Some members, who posted on your part_1 thread have similar views.
It is too much psychological burden to average on the way down
Therefore, I do not recommend such technique for beginners on forex.
Averaging makes sense only of you need to open a very big position, say 500M.
silverbulit, you may start a new thread about averaging and we'll discuss the matter.

3. The deals you posted on our Forum in 3 threads do not match the results you have claimed in the Classified section recently.
I am not a full time moderator on this Forum, so I may have missed something.
If you think somebody else is posting unverifiable past results, you may post your concerns in the appropriate section.

P.S. you may call me "mishak", it's ok

to post # 45201
You may post whatever you like on your web-site. Our Forum has rules about posting past unverifiable results. I've given you the link and the citation to your posts in the Classified section.
You may charge your clients anything, $150 or $5,000 and post your fees in the Classified section.

P.S. sorry I'm late with my response - today is Sunday
__________________
Take Care and Have Fun
mishak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2004, 16:37   #82
For_Ex
level 1
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 56
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Rep Power: 0For_Ex is an unknown quantity at this point
getting better with time....

Quote:
Originally posted by silverbulit
The fact of the matter is my results are audited and they prove beyond any doubt that what I'm posting is real. The results on my website are real and they are only getting better with time. And believe you me - I've already raised many eyebrows from those who really matter (investment houses and banks). It's just a matter of time. Just remember my name.
Silverbulit you most assuredly have raised many eyebrows and suspicions. Since you have chosen to ignore the questions that were asked in a friendly manner it is just a matter of time before any doubts are confirmed. Has far as remembering your name, maybe someone should send you a belt with your name inscribed on the back so when you pull your head out you can be reminded.
__________________
Frank
For_Ex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump