Quote:
|
Originally Posted by psytrader
...the context of that remark was made in reference to the downfall of Long Term Capital Management (LTCM)...
....personal beliefs of truth do not allign with reality....
PSY
|
Yes, but not only, also to the fall of a japanese hedge fund, which name was I think, pardon my japanese

"eifuku" which I think means somethink like fidelity, but I ain't sure.
As for LTCM, well the potential success of their strategy was based more or less on the belief that extreme market developments can be acurately priced and therefore hedged agianst using probabilty and mathematical models. The real world proved theme wrong. They didn't forsee that long established corellations could break down during extreme events. Usefullness of VAR or MonteCarlo analysys failed because of this. Leverage was something that made the problem 25 bigger than it was...
For me (as an fx trader) leverage was never an issue or a topic for theoretical discussions. I have some money that I use to trade, which I call risk capital. On any trade I risk just a small percentage of that money. However I use 100:1 leverage because the higher the leverage, the less money I need to keep at my broker. The rest of the money is safe in my bank. If my broker gave me 500:1 leverage I would just withdraw some money from my trading account and trade on the highest leverage. The value of one pip and th SL compared to my risk capital is what matters.
wozdan