|
|
| ||||
| Re: Trading using only MA's? Quote:
|
| Sponsored Links |
| |
| ||||
| Re: Trading using only MA's? Quote:
Here is an example of true curvilinear trendlines, "X" marks the reference points for the trends (two points each). "R" and "S" mark the predictive support and resistance hits. The right side of each curve is predictive. Note that the second curve continues into the future. I have never considered moving averages to be trendlines, I'll have to ponder that a bit... |
| ||||
| Re: Trading using only MA's? Quote:
How do you know if the line is going up or down or what the slope is without a second point to define the line? I don't mean to be difficult, I just don't understand. Thanks and Happy New Year! |
| ||||
| Re: Trading using only MA's? Quote:
This provides future calculated targets (projection), rather than waiting for a second turn to draw a line (which would very often be the line I already drew). The new line will serve as my reference for support, resistance, or a breakout/continuation. |
| ||||
| Re: Trading using only MA's? Thanks for that Phy, but at the risk of sounding totally stupid I am still a bit confused over how to draw a trend line from one point. What is a standard slope and do you look back at past candles for your reference points of historical price action? Regards Dave |
| ||||
| Re: Trading using only MA's? Fwiw, extract from an academic study (btw there are numerous such studies), the same applies to fx data. They looked at ma's, s/r, channels, etc. "A further purpose of our study is to address this issue by constructing a universe of nearly 8,000 parameterizations of trading rules which are applied to the Dow Jones Industrial Average over a 100-year period from 1897 to 1996. We use the same data set as Brock, Lakonishok and LeBaron (BLL) to investigate the potential effects of data-snooping in their experiment. Our results show that, during the sample originally investigated by BLL, 1897-1986, certain trading rules did indeed outperform the benchmark, even after adjustment is made for data-snooping. We base our evaluation both on mean returns and on a version of the Sharpe ratio which adjusts for total risk. Since BLL's study finished in 1986, we benefit from having access to another 10 years of data on the Dow Jones portfolio. We use this data to test whether their results hold out of-sample. Interestingly, we find that this is not the case: the probability that the best performing trading rule did not outperform the benchmark during this period is nearly 12 percent, suggesting that, at conventional levels of significance, there is scant evidence that technical trading rules were of any economic value during the period 1987-1996." |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Adaptive Portfolio Trading Strategies for Foreign Exchange Portfolios | Admin | General Trading Forum | 2 | 12-05-07 09:31 AM |
| Forex Trading = Gambling | metal | General Trading Forum | 80 | 10-18-05 04:25 AM |