Trading using PRICE TIME

[golhuntsleep]

This is an area that I am just learning......Ruff just posted up a thread using Golden Ratio #'s to justify the end of an uptrend on the eur/jpy.....I have been doing this on a smaller scale it absolutely amazes me how accurate it is to determine the ends of trends........How many of you trade using price time? are you using stirctly Golden Ratio #'s to determine it? Thanks in advance for the input lets make this thread one for us to all grow as traders not measuring our *****

[Trevman]

im not even sure how to work them out but id like to know

[bobnat]

Are you referring to Fibonacci numbers?

Nat

[Trevman]

hes reffering to this thread http://www.moneytec.com/forums/f59/e...e-part1-20287/ dont know if it is fib or not though

[xtsunami]

Originally Posted by golhuntsleep

This is an area that I am just learning......Ruff just posted up a thread using Golden Ratio #'s to justify the end of an uptrend on the eur/jpy.....I have been doing this on a smaller scale it absolutely amazes me how accurate it is to determine the ends of trends........How many of you trade using price time? are you using stirctly Golden Ratio #'s to determine it? Thanks in advance for the input lets make this thread one for us to all grow as traders not measuring our *****

Seems that your timing is a bit off. You should have asked the questions about time trading when you had the opportunity of those who use it. But alas you are late for most of us have no inclination to post here much anymore.

You can take the Golden Ratio progressions that rufffen is posting in his charts it would be better than nothing at all. But there are many techniques that are much more accurate in their time/price precision.

Begin a study of time putting in many many hours days weeks months years you may get to level of precision of someone like stoxx. For on a routine basis has called time/price points to the minute pip.

[golhuntsleep]

Hey Nat ya fibo golden ratios.....i.e. .146 .236 .382 .500 .618 .764 .1.00 etc. I am measuring the last rally using the ratio's to give me projected times the forming correction could end. so not only using them for price ie drawing a fibo on our charts but using the same ratios to determine time.

[bobnat]

Originally Posted by golhuntsleep

Hey Nat ya fibo golden ratios.....i.e. .146 .236 .382 .500 .618 .764 .1.00 etc. I am measuring the last rally using the ratio's to give me projected times the forming correction could end. so not only using them for price ie drawing a fibo on our charts but using the same ratios to determine time.

Well there's a ton of stuff on this site about Fibnoacci numbers. All the threads that contain Elliot Wave will have Fibs. There's also a ton of free stuff on the net on how to underst use Fibs.

Measuring the vertical is pretty easy. Measuring the horizontal the time aspect is more difficult but with practice as Xtsunami pointed out it can be learned.

I started using Fibs over three years ago. I studied the Market Trader's stuff Joe DiNapoli's work. However it was when I studied Robert Miner's "Dynamic Trading" that it came together for me. Miner's work involves Elliot Wave but not as rigorously as others. He prefers simple counting if you can't count it don't trade it. By using EW a lot of unanswered questions mysteries I had encountered trading Fibs were solved. Fibs are amazing but EW explains the larger picture.

Like anything else it takes many hours of work. I spent countless hours drawing fibs. Now I can spot levels without drawing them in it just becomes that easy. Trading them isn't that hard either as long as you have a plan.

I'd suggest you study the basic Fib stuff here try the thread "Can it get any easier" by Mick Mason for an intro to the basics. Study all the free stuff you can find. After a few months of doing that then read Miner's book you'll be surprised at the holes it'll fill.

Nat

[trade123]

Hi! I have been working with geometry in price time. Sometimes its other geometries like the cube sometimes the Fibs. Often price lengths time are related. I have not seen anyone forecast consistently with it but maybe it´s possible?